Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 21;175(7):636–644. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr409

Table 1.

Regression Results for the Effect of Parental Incarceration on Body Mass Index, National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, 1994–2008a

Full Sample
Males
Females
Estimate 95% CI P Value Estimate 95% CI P Value Estimate 95% CI P Value
Model 1: baseline 0.358 0.147, 0.569 <0.001 0.038 –0.373, 0.250 <0.793 0.599 0.299, 0.900 <0.000
Model 2: alternative risks 0.382 0.149, 0.614 <0.001 0.160 –0.160, 0.482 <0.325 0.517 0.187, 0.849 <0.002
Model 3: stressful life events 0.383 0.151, 0.615 <0.001 0.171 –0.150, 0.491 <0.297 0.510 0.180, 0.840 <0.002
Model 4: full model 0.365 0.134, 0.597 <0.002 0.158 –0.162, 0.479 <0.332 0.490 0.161, 0.818 <0.004
Model 5: Δ BMI (wave II − wave IV) 0.178 –0.351, 0.709 <0.509 –0.621 –1.310, 0.066 <0.076 0.916 0.112, 1.720 <0.026

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval.

a

All data come from waves I–IV of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Cell entries represent linear mixed-model parameter estimates for the average effect of parental incarceration on BMI across 4 waves of the study (models 1–4) and change (Δ) in BMI from wave II to wave IV (model 5). In all models, the unit of analysis for BMI is weight (kg)/height (m)2.