Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011 Sep 24;257(2):301–308. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.09.014

Table 5.

Parameter estimates from models of natural log-transformed hair Hg levels with exposure variable (estimated mercury intake from fish consumption, ug per kg body weight per day), genotype, and genotype-by-fish Hg interactions. Models with significant genotype variables are reported. Beta coefficients (95% CI) are reported for each predictor variable. Statistically significant beta coefficients (p<0.05) are bolded.

SNP na Adj. r2 Fish Hg Genotype Genotype* Fish Hg

Base Model 503 0.19 3.62 (2.96, 4.28)
GSTP1-105 214, 216, 44 0.2 2.87 (0.95, 4.8) -0.22 (-0.38, - 0.06) 0.42 (-0.73, 1.57)
GSTP1-114 393, 69, 2 0.2 2.91 (0.74, 5.07) -0.31 (-0.6, -0.03) 0.67 (-1.05, 2.39)
SEPP1 3’UTR 245, 188, 36 0.19 6.22 (4.14, 8.29) 0.15 (-0.02, 0.32) -1.61 (-2.82, -0.4)
GSS 5’ 94, 111, 44 0.15 0.34 (-2.13, 2.81) -0.15 (-0.35, 0.06) 1.88 (0.44, 3.31)
a

Number of subjects in model in each genotype group. Genotype groups are major homozygote, heterozygote, minor homozygote.