Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Surg Res. 2010 Apr 7;171(1):361–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.030

TABLE 1.

Selected Early Wound Infiltrates in IgG versus anti-CD1d Treated Mi

D 0
D 1
D 3
IgG Anti-CD1d IgG Anti-CD1d IgG Anti-CD1d
CD3+ 2.81 ± 0.40* 2.64 ± 0.21§ 6.59 ± 0.51 6.64 ± 0.68§ 10.58 ± 0.87 10.22 ± 0.42§
Dimer+CD3+ 0.00 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.01§ 5.68 ± 0.16 5.97 ± 0.25§ 5.98 ± 0.67 5.70 ± 0.59§
F4/80+ 4.57 ± 0.31 4.43 ± 0.84§ 7.97 ± 0.26 8.01 ± 1.37§ 20.59 ± 0.97 20.99 ± 0.81§
GR-1+ 0.54 ± 0.12 0.36 ± 0.14§ 49.33 ± 1.88 50.68 ± 0.88§ 23.54 ± 1.03 24.11 ± 1.18§
*

Values expressed as percentage of live cells ± SEM.

NKT cells expressed as a percentage of lymphocytes ± SEM.

D (day) 0 refers to skin from an uninjured mouse.

§

No statistical differences (IgG versus anti-CD1d) by Student’s t-test.