Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 20;5:269–275. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S29599

Table 2.

Patients’ responses to experience and satisfaction with informed consent (IC) process and to the information given about the risks and alternative treatment options

Statement Responses

Yes n (%) No n (%) Don’t know n (%)
(A) Satisfaction with IC process
1. I was told my signature was just routine* 107 (66.5) 46 (28.6) 8 (4.9)
2. The IC explanation was not enough* 56 (34.6) 100 (61.7) 6 (3.7)
3. No time was allowed for questions* 55 (34) 103 (63.6) 4 (2.4)
4. I was not asked to repeat the consent to make sure that I understood its contents* 55 (34) 104 (64.2) 3 (1.8)
5. I had the chance to ask questions 113 (70.2) 38 (23.6) 10 (6.2)
6. I was given a copy of the document I signed 13 (8) 144 (88.9) 5 (3.1)
7. It had different information from what I was originally told 25 (15.6) 110 (68.8) 25 (15.6)
8. I accepted and signed fully convinced 142 (87.7) 14 (8.6) 6 (3.7)
9. My decision is not important because my doctor has already decided on the proper treatment plan* 82 (50.6) 77 (47.5) 3 (1.9)
10. Somebody else made sure of my decision 145 (89.5) 17 (10.5)
11. I was not educated about my treatment plan* 59 (36.4) 94 (58.0) 9 (5.6)
12. I wish I had been consulted by the doctor* 69 (42.6) 87 (53.7) 6 (3.7)
% mean score (standard deviation) 54.14 ± 17.88
(B) Satisfaction with information given about the risks and alternative treatment options
1. The risks were explained to me 78 (48.1) 81 (50.0) 3 (1.9)
2. I needed extra information and it was not given* 43 (26.5) 116 (71.6) 3 (1.9)
3. I was given a plan to treat the risks 46 (28.4) 107 (66) 9 (5.6)
4. I was given a contact if I needed it 66 (40.8) 88 (54.3) 8 (4.9)
5. The patient was able to recall the risks 63 (38.9) 30 (18.5) 69 (42.6)
6. I was not informed about the alternative treatment options* 57 (35.2) 99 (61.1) 6 (3.7)
7. The patient was able to recall the alternative treatment options 43 (26.5) 28 (17.3) 91 (56.2)
% mean score (standard deviation) 45.06 ± 27.14
Overall % mean score of quality (standard deviation) 50.98 ± 17.49

Note:

*

Score was calculated as a negative statement.