Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 20;5:269–275. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S29599

Table 4.

Five-point Likert scale of the patients’ attitude toward the practice of informed consent (IC)

Statement Strongly agree (n, %) Agree (n, %) Not sure (n, %) Disagree (n, %) Strongly disagree (n, %)
1. The explanation must be easy and thorough 95 (58.7) 53 (32.7) 6 (3.7) 8 (4.9)
2. Using medical jargon intimidates patients* 68 (42.2) 58 (36.0) 7 (4.4) 27 (16.8) 1 (0.6)
3. Too much information scares patients* 68 (42.0) 51 (31.5) 6 (3.7) 36 (22.2) 1 (0.6)
4. All risks need to be explained to the patient 103 (63.6) 48 (29.6) 1 (0.6) 10 (6.2)
5. It is important to repeat the explanation if the patient demands it 104 (64.2) 49 (30.2) 4 (2.5) 5 (3.1)
6. All alternative treatment options must be explained 108 (66.6) 46 (28.4) 3 (1.9) 5 (3.1)
7. It is important to know the plan for emergencies 102 (63.0) 53 (32.7) 4 (2.5) 3 (1.8)
8. It is important to have someone to contact in case of emergencies 122 (75.8) 30 (18.6) 4 (2.5) 5 (3.1)
9. It is important to have enough time to read the IC 108 (66.7) 42 (25.9) 4 (2.5) 8 (4.9)
10. It is important to have answers to all my questions 114 (70.4) 42 (25.9) 4 (2.5) 1 (0.6) 1 (0.6)
11. It is not important to have a copy of the IC* 11 (6.8) 71 (43.8) 11 (6.8) 52 (32.1) 17 (10.5)
12. Patients should delegate the right of decision making to the doctor* 47 (29.2) 66 (41.0) 9 (5.6) 38 (23.6) 1 (0.6)
13. I want to choose my route of treatment 67 (41.4) 67 (41.4) 17 (10.5) 9 (5.5) 2 (1.2)
14. If I say no, I might lose the good relationship with my doctor* 37 (23.1) 31 (19.4) 28 (17.5) 57 (35.6) 7 (4.4)
15. Saying no means I will not continue having the same great treatment* 35 (21.6) 43 (26.5) 24 (14.8) 55 (34) 5 (3.1)
16. It is better to have a second opinion 65 (40.2) 51 (31.5) 19 (11.7) 25 (15.4) 2 (1.2)
17. It is insulting to ask for a second opinion* 16 (9.9) 27 (16.7) 17 (10.5) 85 (52.4) 17 (10.5)
% mean score (standard deviation) 76.31 ± 7.63

Note:

*

Score was calculated as a negative statement.