Table 4.
Posterior inferences results on replicated datasets (100 replicates), using the SQI thresholds from 100 null datasets
| LG 1 | LG 2 | LG 3 | LG 4 | LG 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simulation | |||||
| Position | 22.0 | 44.0 | 66.0 | 88.0 | |
| Effect | 1.30 | 1.10 | 0.90 | 0.70 | |
| Segregationa | 82 | 92 | 88 | 87 | 0 |
| UNR | |||||
| Powerb | 81 | 88 | 69 | 67 | 37e |
| Locationc | 29.5 (9.7) | 45.8 (9.4) | 55.2 (11.5) | 60.0 (17.8) | |
| Effectd | 0.86 (0.49) | 0.55 (0.43) | 0.35 (0.46) | 0.24 (0.39) | |
| TIBD | |||||
| Power | 77 | 83 | 69 | 54 | 7e |
| Location | 25.5 (5.5) | 43.5 (6.6) | 61.8 (9.9) | 75.4 (13.0) | |
| Effect | 1.10 (0.25) | 0.90 (0.24) | 0.73 (0.34) | 0.58 (0.32) | |
| LAAM | |||||
| Power | 77 | 83 | 71 | 55 | 10e |
| Location | 25.4 (6.2) | 43.2 (6.9) | 61.8 (9.3) | 75.0 (14.3) | |
| Effect | 1.10 (0.25) | 0.91 (0.25) | 0.72 (0.34) | 0.59 (0.32) |
aNumber of replicates with QTL segregation
bSignificance threshold: 95% quantile of SQI (summed QTL intensity) from 100 null datasets. Threshold values were 0.127,0.206, and 0.196 for UNR, TIBD and LAAM respectively
cMean (standard deviation) of the estimated posterior mean of QTL location
dMean (standard deviation) of the estimated posterior mean of QTL effect across genome
eType I error as no QTL was simulated on Linkage Group 5