Skip to main content
. 2012 Jan 7;124(6):1097–1113. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1772-8

Table 5.

Posterior inferences results on replicated datasets (100 replicates), using the same SQI threshold of 0.50 for all scenarios of analysis

LG 1 LG 2 LG 3 LG 4 LG 5
Simulation
 Position 22.0 44.0 66.0 88.0
 Effect 1.30 1.10 0.90 0.70
 Segregationa 82 92 88 87 n.r.
UNR
 Powerb 66 63 29 21 2e
 Locationc 22.4 (7.7) 44.9 (17.0) 64.3 (14.3) 78.5 (30.2)
 Effectd 1.40 (0.23) 1.16 (0.29) 1.27 (0.31) 1.22 (0.46)
TIBD
 Power 73 77 56 43 1e
 Location 22.0 (4.8) 42.3 (7.4) 64.4 (11.2) 80.6 (19.1)
 Effect 1.31 (0.21) 1.11 (0.21) 1.01 (0.29) 0.89 (0.31)
LAAM
 Power 73 77 56 43 1e
 Location 21.8 (4.1) 42.1 (7.8) 63.6 (11.2) 80.4 (22.2)
 Effect 1.30 (0.20) 1.12 (0.18) 1.02 (0.29) 0.89 (0.28)

aNumber of replicates with QTL segregation

bSignificance threshold: SQI (summed QTL intensity) >0.50

cMean (standard deviation) of the estimated posterior mode of QTL location

dMean (standard deviation) of the estimated QTL effect at posterior mode of QTL location

eType I error as no QTL was simulated on Linkage Group 5