Table 5.
Posterior inferences results on replicated datasets (100 replicates), using the same SQI threshold of 0.50 for all scenarios of analysis
| LG 1 | LG 2 | LG 3 | LG 4 | LG 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simulation | |||||
| Position | 22.0 | 44.0 | 66.0 | 88.0 | |
| Effect | 1.30 | 1.10 | 0.90 | 0.70 | |
| Segregationa | 82 | 92 | 88 | 87 | n.r. |
| UNR | |||||
| Powerb | 66 | 63 | 29 | 21 | 2e |
| Locationc | 22.4 (7.7) | 44.9 (17.0) | 64.3 (14.3) | 78.5 (30.2) | |
| Effectd | 1.40 (0.23) | 1.16 (0.29) | 1.27 (0.31) | 1.22 (0.46) | |
| TIBD | |||||
| Power | 73 | 77 | 56 | 43 | 1e |
| Location | 22.0 (4.8) | 42.3 (7.4) | 64.4 (11.2) | 80.6 (19.1) | |
| Effect | 1.31 (0.21) | 1.11 (0.21) | 1.01 (0.29) | 0.89 (0.31) | |
| LAAM | |||||
| Power | 73 | 77 | 56 | 43 | 1e |
| Location | 21.8 (4.1) | 42.1 (7.8) | 63.6 (11.2) | 80.4 (22.2) | |
| Effect | 1.30 (0.20) | 1.12 (0.18) | 1.02 (0.29) | 0.89 (0.28) |
aNumber of replicates with QTL segregation
bSignificance threshold: SQI (summed QTL intensity) >0.50
cMean (standard deviation) of the estimated posterior mode of QTL location
dMean (standard deviation) of the estimated QTL effect at posterior mode of QTL location
eType I error as no QTL was simulated on Linkage Group 5