Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 21;31(38):13682–13694. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2300-11.2011

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Single particle tracking of CaV1.2 in the cell surface of dendrites and axons of hippocampal neurons. A, Membrane topology of CaV1.2 channels showing the position of the SEP-tag and HA-tag used for labeling with quantum dots. B, Fluorescence images of a dendrite and an axon of a CaV1.2-HA and Homer1C-DsRed-cotransfected neuron (grayscale image) with superimposed trajectories of individual QD-labeled CaV1.2-HA channels (red). Scale bar, 5 μm. Magnified trajectories (right) show that during the 60 s recording time, CaV1.2-HA is transiently confined in dendrites during periods of free diffusion. Scale bar, 1 μm. C, D, Comparison of current–voltage curves and voltage dependences of activation of untagged, HA-, and SEP-tagged CaV1.2 (black, red, green lines, respectively) expressed and recorded in dysgenic myotubes (mean ± SEM). E, Distribution curves of the instantaneous diffusion coefficients of the SEP- and HA-tagged constructs are identical (mean ± SEM). F, The mean square displacement curves indicate strongly confined movement in dendrites and diffusive movement of CaV1.2-SEP in axons; for comparison, note the MSD curve of the freely diffusive GPI-GFP in the axon. G, The diffusion coefficients for both constructs are an order of magnitude lower in dendrites than axons (HA-tagdendritic = 0.005 μm2 s−1 IQR 0.0007/0.02; SEP-tagdendritic = 0.007 μm2 s−1 IQR 0.002/0.02; HA-tagaxonal = 0.04 μm2 s−1 IQR 0.02/0.07; SEP-tagaxonal = 0.06 μm2 s−1 IQR 0.02/0.1; Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by a Dunn's test, p < 0.0001). H, The probability of confinement is significantly higher in dendrites than in axons (one-way ANOVA followed by a Newman–Keuls test, p < 0.0001).