Table 2.
Results of the final multiple regression models showing the ability of psychological variables to explain the variance in RM scores, over and above that explained by the functional test index scores
MODEL and variables selected for inclusion at each step | Standardised beta coefficient | R2 | Adjusted R2 | Step increase in adj. R2 (%) | p value, R2 step change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline data | |||||
Step 1—forced entry | |||||
Functional test index score | 0.472 | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.0001 | |
Step 2—stepwise selection | |||||
FAB-work | 0.457 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 19 | 0.001 |
Post-therapy data | |||||
Step 1—forced entry | |||||
Functional test index score | 0.603 | 0.46 | 0.44 | <0.0001 | |
Step 2—stepwise selection | |||||
Psychological disturbance (MSPQ and ZUNG score) | 0.294 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 7 | <0.05 |
Longitudinal (change-score) data | |||||
Step 1—forced entry | |||||
Change score, functional test index score | 0.468 | 0.30 | 0.28 | 0.001 | |
Step 2—stepwise selection | |||||
Change score, catastrophising | 0.500 | 0.54 | 0.51 | 23 | 0.001 |