Skip to main content
. 2012 Mar 20;21(Suppl 2):187–195. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2255-6

Table 2.

Results of the final multiple regression models showing the ability of psychological variables to explain the variance in RM scores, over and above that explained by the functional test index scores

MODEL and variables selected for inclusion at each step Standardised beta coefficient R2 Adjusted R2 Step increase in adj. R2 (%) p value, R2 step change
Baseline data
Step 1—forced entry
 Functional test index score 0.472 0.36 0.34 0.0001
Step 2—stepwise selection
 FAB-work 0.457 0.55 0.53 19 0.001
Post-therapy data
Step 1—forced entry
 Functional test index score 0.603 0.46 0.44 <0.0001
Step 2—stepwise selection
 Psychological disturbance (MSPQ and ZUNG score) 0.294 0.54 0.51 7 <0.05
Longitudinal (change-score) data
Step 1—forced entry
 Change score, functional test index score 0.468 0.30 0.28 0.001
Step 2—stepwise selection
 Change score, catastrophising 0.500 0.54 0.51 23 0.001