Table 3.
Inactive promoters scoring below module cut-off thresholds
Data set | Number of inactive promoters | Percentage of inactive promoters scoring below module cut-off thresholds |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S + D pen | −35 | Spacer | −10 | Disc | Start | ITR | −10/−35a | Full-length scoreb | All modulesc | ||
MR 10 nM RNAP | 30 | 3 | 33 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 7 | 27 | 57 | 33 | 77 |
In vivo basal | 37 | 3 | 54 | 3 | 22 | 24 | 0 | 51 | 78 | 59 | 95 |
aCombined −10 and −35 PWM score threshold. bFull-length model score threshold comprised of core and UP models. cCumulative effect of applying all module cut-off thresholds.