Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Jan 23;5(2):152–159. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963199

Table 3.

Percent agreement (kappa coefficient) between HF classification criteria. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.*

Heart failure diagnostic classification criteria

Heart failure diagnostic classification criteria Framingham Modified Boston NHANES Gothenburg ICD-9-CM 428
ARIC (acute decompensated HF) 69.5 (0.32) 63.7 (0.18) 60.9 (0.10) 59.5 (0.11) 62.9 (0.13)
ARIC (any HF) 70.5 (0.21) 68.1 (0.10) 67.4 (0.03) 66.9 (0.13) 75.3 (0.22)
Framingham 87.2 (0.61) 81.1 (0.38) 72.9 (0.24) 75.7 (0.14)
Modified Boston 89.5 (0.62) 74.2 (0.23) 77.4 (0.09)
NHANES 73.3 (0.14) 79.3 (0.03)
Gothenburg 74.4 (0.12)
*

Among hospitalized events eligible for review by the ARIC HF Classification Committee. The data are weighted to account for the sampling probabilities (705 sampled events yielding a weighted number of 5011).

combines cases classified as definite and possible decompensated HF together as HF = yes; chronic stable HF, or HF unlikely combined as heart failure = no

combines cases classified as definite and possible decompensated HF, and chronic stable HF together as HF = yes; HF unlikely classified as HF = no