Skip to main content
. 2001 May 8;98(10):5661–5666. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091100998

Table 2.

1-D and 2-D fits of geometric constraints model predictions for different categories

Perspective n Passerines (1,064)
Nonpasserines (532)
Range size
≤100 (756)
>100 (840)
r2 ta=0 tb=1 r2 ta=0 tb=1 r2 ta=0 tb=1 r2 ta=0 tb1
1-D band mean
 Latitude 55 0.58 −1.94 2.48 0.65 0.12 0.23 0.05 3.28 −3.03 0.68 −1.35 1.84
 Longitude 68 0.60 0.01 −0.08 0.49 3.66 −3.25 0.00 1.71 −1.71 0.60 1.86 −1.71
2-D 1,742 0.18 2.32 −2.91 0.22 11.43 −11.90 0.02 12.57 −12.59 0.26 6.53 −6.69

Regression results from the geometric constraints model for different categories. Numbers in parentheses refer to numbers of species in the category. n is the number of observations for each test; ta=0 is the t test statistic that indicates the deviation of intercept a from zero for the regression of observed versus predicted data (a measure of fit in magnitude); tb=1 indicates the deviation of slope b of the regression from unity (a measure of fit in shape). t values in italics indicate a rejection of the tested hypothesis at the P = 0.05 level (two-tailed). Note that in this test as few as ten truly independent observations are sufficient to reject the null hypothesis for any t > 2.3 and not even over 10,000 observations can reject it for any t < 1.96.