Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neurophysiol. 2011 Jul 28;122(12):2441–2451. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.05.020

Table 2.

Pearson's correlation coefficients for the affected hands and unaffected hands of subjects with tspFHD for the conditions found to be significantly different than healthy controls in the MEG somatosensory paradigm (Q, latency). A single asterisk indicates the correlations that are statistically significant (p<0.05). Double asterisks indicate the correlations that are clinically significant (r>0.05).

Sensory Score Motor Score Strength Function Task-Specific Motor Control
Q
High rate condition, contralateral hemisphere, S2/PV, affected digits -.33 -.19 .02 .23 .48
High rate condition, contralateral hemisphere, S2/PV, unaffected digits -.47 -.25 .25 -.03 na
High rate condition, ipsilateral hemisphere, S2/PV, affected digits -.56** -.26 -.02 -.09 .55**
Latency
Low rate condition, contralateral hemisphere, S1, unaffected digits -.04 .39 .13 .14 na
Oddball condition, contralateral hemisphere, S1, affected digits -.49 -.26 -.04 -.17 .45
Oddball condition, contralateral hemisphere, S1, unaffected digits .04 .12 .13 -.35 na
High rate condition, ipsilateral hemisphere, S1, affected digits .59* .17 .30 .05 -.24
Low rate condition, ipsilateral hemisphere, S2/PV, affected digits -.03 .58* .56* .53** .47
High rate condition, ipsilateral hemisphere, S2/PV, affected digits .09 .14 .17 .28 .51**