Table 1.
Progeny | Eye score
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
Expressing brmK804R | ||||||
FM7 live | 0 | 12 | 19 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
FM7 pharate | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
FM7 total | 0 | 12 | 25 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Df(1)18.1.15 live | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 3 |
Df(1)18.1.15 pharate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 18 |
Df(1)18.1.15 total | 0 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 21 |
Df(1)18.1.15, [w+, UAS-BAP111] live | 4 | 74 | 62 | 9 | 3 | 0 |
Df(1)18.1.15, [w+, UAS-BAP111] pharate | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Df(1)18.1.15, [w+, UAS-BAP111] total | 4 | 76 | 64 | 9 | 3 | 0 |
Expressing brmK804R | ||||||
FM7 live | 0 | 4 | 13 | 23 | 0 | 0 |
FM7 pharate | 0 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
FM7 total | 0 | 4 | 19 | 27 | 0 | 0 |
Df(1)18.1.15 live | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
Df(1)18.1.15 pharate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 11 | 17 |
Df(1)18.1.15 total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 16 | 21 |
Df(1)18.1.15, [w+, UAS-BAP111ΔHMG] live | 0 | 7 | 8 | 24 | 11 | 1 |
Df(1)18.1.15, [w+, UAS-BAP111ΔHMG] pharate | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
Df(1)18.1.15, [w+, UAS-BAP111ΔHMG] total | 0 | 7 | 11 | 27 | 11 | 2 |
Expressing ISWIK159R | ||||||
FM7 live | 0 | 22 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FM7 pharate | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FM7 total | 0 | 25 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Df(1)18.1.15 live | 13 | 19 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Df(1)18.1.15 pharate | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Df(1)18.1.15 total | 15 | 21 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Eyes of female progeny from crosses described in Methods were scored for defects. Numerical scores are defined as follows: 1 = wild-type eye, 2 = roughness comprising ≤50% of normal eye area, 3 = roughness comprising >50% of normal eye area, 4 = roughness of eye and eye slightly reduced in size, 5 = roughness of eye and eye size reduced by >50%, and 6 = eye absent (no recognizable omatidia). FM7 (the FM7c balancer chromosome bearing the dominant eye marker Bar) was scored as a 2. The difference in FM7c vs. Df(1)18.1.15 data is significant for the flies expressing brmK804R (P < 0.001), as is the rescue by the wild-type BAP111 transgene (P < 0.001 for Df(1)18.1.15 vs. Df(1)18.1.15, P[w+, UAS-BAP111]22-1). No significant shift was caused by the Df(1)18.1.15 in the flies expressing ISWIK159R (P < 0.10).