Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 17;7(4):e33819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033819

Table 4. The effect of field site, year, growth stage and cultivar on soil ascomycete, basidiomycete and glomeromycete diversity for different taxonomic levels.

Field Year Growth stage Cultivar* GM-parent*
F P F P F P F P F P
Ascomycota OTUs 0.005/0.004 0.94/0.94 7.80/3.89 <0.001/0.02 12.76/9.16 <0.001 0.65/0.32 0.66/0.91 2.67/0.49 0.11/0.49
Orders 0.33/0.009 0.57/0.92 7.44/3.56 <0.005/0.03 10.8/13.22 <0.001 0.59/0.52 0.64/0.76 2.74/1.58 0.10/0.21
Classes 9.30/9.50 0.03/0.02 10.80/9.64 <0.001 6.78/5.76 <0.001 15.58/34.61 <0.001 2.97/2.31 0.09/0.31
Basidiomycota OTUs 1.803/0.523 0.18/0.47 9.49/6.64 <0.001/0.002 13.84/9.37 <0.001 1.24/1.41 0.29/0.23 0.03/0.02 0.87/0.90
Orders 0.04/0.002 0.85/0.97 21.85/17.86 <0.001 8.99/6.48 <0.001 1.85/2.08 0.13/0.09 0.19/0.37 0.67/0.54
Glomeromycota OTUs 14.67/15.04 <0.001 24.48/20.72 <0.001 3.01/2.76 0.03/0.04 1.91/1.63 0.09/0.15 1.91/1.40 0.17/0.24
Orders 38.22/35.98 <0.001 12.50/9.99 <0.001 2.29/2.13 0.08/0.09 1.91/1.89 0.09/0.10 1.17/1.59 0.19/0.21
*

Only samples where plant was present are included in the analyses.

All diversities were calculated using both Shannon H’ and Simpson diversity indexes and presented in the table as Shannon H’/Simpson diversity. If both P-values are the same, only one value is presented. Diversity index for classes was not calculated for basidiomycetes and glomeromycetes due to low numbers or unevenness of classes. Significant P-values are marked with bold.