Table 5. ANOVAs of the effect of cultivar (including all cultivars) and GM-cultivar ‘Modena’ versus parental cultivar ‘Karnico’ on diversity of ascomycetes, basidiomycetes and glomeromycetes in the rhizosphere in both fields, all years and growth stages.
Diversity of Ascomycota (Shannon H) | Diversity of Basidiomycota (Shannon H) | Diversity of Glomeromycota (Shannon H) | ||||||||||
Cultivar | GM-Parent | Order level | Cultivar | GM-Parent | Order level | Cultivar | GM-Parent | Order level | ||||
df. 5 | df. 1 | df. 5 | df. 1 | df. 5 | df. 1 | |||||||
Field BUI | 2008 | Young | F | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.21 | 0.60 | 0.38 | 0.38 | |||
P | 0.89 | 0.75 | n.s. | 0.95 | 0.48 | n.s. | 0.86 | 0.85 | n.s. | |||
Flowering | F | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.79 | 0.56 | 0.62 | 2.34 | |||||
P | 0.91 | 1.00 | n.s. | 0.58 | 0.50 | n.s. | 0.69 | 0.22 | n.s. | |||
Senescence | F | 2.93 | 0.05 | 0.99 | 0.30 | 0.93 | 0.60 | |||||
P | 0.11 | 0.83 | n.s. | 0.47 | 0.61 | n.s. | 0.50 | 0.50 | n.s. | |||
2009 | Young | F | 0.88 | 1.22 | 0.23 | 0.40 | 0.99 | 0.88 | ||||
P | 0.51 | 0.52 | n.s. | 0.92 | 0.55 | n.s. | 0.46 | 0.38 | n.s. | |||
Flowering | F | 2.86 | 1.14 | 3.28 | 0.21 | 0.64 | 0.71 | |||||
P | 0.14 | 0.35 | n.s. | 0.10 | 0.63 | n.s. | 0.56 | 0.44 | n.s. | |||
Senescence | F | 1.35 | 3.29 | 4.88 | 1.19 | nd | nd | |||||
P | 0.35 | 0.21 | n.s. | 0.77 | 0.29 | n.s. | nd | nd | n.s. | |||
2010 | Young | F | 6.25 | 13.80 | 3.83/11.27 | 0.79 | 5.98 | 0.54 | 0.60 | |||
P | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02/0.001 | 0.58 | 0.07 | n.s. | 0.74 | 0.50 | n.s. | |||
Flowering | F | 0.46 | 0.00 | 2.86 | 2.24 | 0.43 | 0.13 | |||||
P | 0.80 | 0.98 | n.s. | 0.14 | 0.38 | n.s. | 0.82 | 0.74 | n.s. | |||
Senescence | F | 1.37 | 1.14 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 4.41 | 0.82 | |||||
P | 0.30 | 0.35 | n.s. | 0.86 | 0.82 | n.s. | 0.99 | 0.40 | n.s. | |||
Field VMD | 2008 | Young | F | 1.73 | 1.89 | 0.45 | 0.19 | 4.77 | 38.37 | 2.38/40.38 | ||
P | 0.19 | 0.49 | n.s. | 0.80 | 0.69 | n.s. | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02/0.001 | |||
Flowering | F | 0.85 | 4.35 | 0.43 | 0.37 | 2.23 | 0.41 | |||||
P | 0.52 | 0.17 | n.s. | 0.79 | 0.58 | n.s. | 0.15 | 0.59 | n.s. | |||
Senescence | F | 0.99 | 0.04 | 0.57 | 0.34 | 0.13 | 0.32 | |||||
P | 0.48 | 0.86 | n.s. | 0.73 | 0.59 | n.s. | 0.93 | 0.62 | n.s. | |||
2009 | Young | F | 0.64 | 1.79 | 0.45 | 0.26 | 0.51 | 0.20 | ||||
P | 0.62 | 0.41 | n.s. | 0.73 | 0.64 | n.s. | 0.69 | 0.67 | n.s. | |||
Flowering | F | 0.64 | 1.08 | 4.95 | 0.90 | 0.47 | 0.71 | |||||
P | 0.61 | 0.41 | n.s. | 0.04 | 0.39 | n.s. | 0.76 | 0.44 | n.s. | |||
Senescence | F | 0.35 | 1.21 | 5.54 | 0.93 | 4.37/1.61 | 2.31 | 23.78 | ||||
P | 0.84 | 0.44 | n.s. | 0.02 | 0.38 | 0.04/0.26 | 0.15 | 0.16 | n.s. | |||
2010 | Young | F | 0.49 | 0.42 | 0.62 | 2.92 | 1.12 | 1.89 | ||||
P | 0.78 | 0.84 | n.s. | 0.66 | 0.15 | n.s. | 0.56 | 0.49 | n.s. | |||
Flowering | F | 2.66 | 7.84 | 1.43/1.17 | 2.72 | 2.34 | 0.46 | 0.33 | ||||
P | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.28/0.03 | 0.13 | 0.22 | n.s. | 0.77 | 0.67 | n.s. | |||
Senescence | F | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.54 | 2.87 | 0.49 | 0.42 | |||||
P | 0.50 | 0.38 | n.s. | 0.67 | 0.17 | n.s. | 0.75 | 0.86 | n.s. |
The diversities were estimated using Shannon-H’. The first two columns of each fungal group are performed at the level of OTUs and the third column indicates significance at the level of orders. Significant P-values are marked with bold.