Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuroimmunol. 2012 Mar 13;245(1-2):39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2012.02.003

Table 1.

Adoptive transfer of Salmonella/CFA-I (H696)-induced CD25+CD4+ T cells to naïve recipients confers protection against EAE in a TGF-β-dependent fashion.

Adoptive Transfer/Treatment a Day of Onset b EAE c/Total Max. Score d C.S. e
PBS IgG1 7.4±0.4 15/15 5 57.8
α-TGF-β 7.8±1.4 15/15 5 46.8
H696 CD25+/ IgG1 11.4±0.6 *, †, ++ 9/15 1 2.8 *, †, +
CD25+/α-TGF-β 7.8±1.8 15/15 5 49.8
CD25/ IgG1 9±1.2 15/15 4 12.2
CD25/α-TGF-β 8.4±0.6 15/15 5 51.2
H647 CD25+/ IgG1 8.8±1.3 15/15 5 28 **, ††
CD25+/α-TGF-β 8.2±0.4 15/15 5 50.6
CD25/ IgG1 8.4±1.6 15/15 5 39.2
CD25/α-TGF-β 8.2±0.6 15/15 5 52.2
a

Two wks after immunization with H696 or H647, cell-sorted CD25+CD4+ and CD25CD4+ T cells were adoptively transferred (5x105) into naïve recipients 1 day prior to EAE induction. EAE was induced as described in Materials and Methods on day 0. Mice were treated with anti-TGF-β mAb or its isotype Ab on the day of adoptive transfer and 4 days post-EAE challenge

b

Mean day ± SD of clinical disease onset. *, p < 0.001 versus PBS/IgG1; , p < 0.001 versus CD25+/α-TGF-β; ++, p < 0.05 versus CD25/IgG1.

c

Number of mice with EAE/total number of mice in group.

d

Maximum (Max.) daily clinical score.

e

Cumulative disease scores (C.S.) were calculated as the sum of all clinical score from disease onset to the days of sacrifice, divided by the number of mice in each group. *, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.05 versus PBS/IgG1; , p < 0.001; ††, p < 0.05 versus CD25+/α-TGF-β; +, p < 0.001 versus CD25/IgG1.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure