Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neuroimmunol. 2012 Mar 13;245(1-2):39–47. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2012.02.003

Table 2.

Adoptive transfer of Salmonella-CFA/I-induced CD25+CD4+ T cells enhances Foxp3+ frequency in the recipient micea.

Treatment b % Fox3+/CD4+ c Average Clinical Score d
PBS IgG1 8.2 ± 2.4 4.2 ± 0.5
α-TGF-β 6.2 ± 3.6 4.4 ± 0.6
H696 CD25+/IgG1 37.2 ± 3.6 *, †, + 0.4 ± 0.2 *, †, +
CD25+/α-TGF-β 12.2 ± 3.2 4.0 ± 0.5
CD25/IgG1 16.5 ± 3.1 ** 2.4 ± 0.8 **, ††
CD25/α-TGF-β 11.4 ± 2.8 4.2 ± 0.5
H647 CD25+/IgG1 14.5 ± 2.7 †† 3.8 ± 0.6
CD25+/α-TGF-β 8.54 ± 2.2 4.4 ± 0.8
CD25/IgG1 11.8 ± 2.5 3.8 ± 0.2
CD25/α-TGF-β 10.3 ± 3.8 4.2 ± 0.6
a

Naïve SJL recipients were adoptively transferred with cell-sorted CD25+CD4+ and CD25CD4+ T cells from mice previously (2 wks earlier) immunized with H696 or H647 vaccines one day prior to EAE.

b

Mice were treated twice with anti-TGF-β mAb or its isotype IgG1 control Ab on the same day of adoptive transfer and 4 days post-EAE challenge.

c

At the peak of EAE, CD4+ T cells were purified from HNLNs obtained from individual mice and measured Foxp3+ frequency by FACS. Seven mice/group were used and data represent mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.05 versus PBS/IgG1; , p < 0.001; ††, p < 0.05 versus CD25+/α-TGF-β; +, p < 0.001 versus CD25/IgG1.

d

Upon termination of experiment, clinical scores were measured, and the data represent mean clinical score ± SEM. *, p < 0.001; **, p < 0.05 versus PBS/IgG1; , p < 0.001; ††, p < 0.05 versus CD25+/α-TGF-β; +, p < 0.001 versus CD25/IgG1.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure