Table 2.
Model | t0 [day] | ε | δ [day−1] | η | AIC | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10+15 mg/kg/day dosing group | 20 mg/kg/day dosing group | ||||||
Blocking infection only | Pop. parameters | 0** | 0 | 0 | 3.36 | 0.40* | 232.7 |
SE | 1.30 | 0.072 | |||||
Q1–Q3 | 2.0–5.81 | -- | |||||
Blocking production only | Pop. parameters | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0 | 26.3 |
SE | 0.036 | 0.13 | 0.034 | 0.076 | |||
Q1–Q3 | 0.65–0.73 | 0.43–0.81 | 0.72–0.98 | 0.78–1.03 | |||
Blocking production and infection | Pop. parameters | 0.66 | 0.49 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.60* | 16.7 |
SE | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.049 | 0.075 | 0.18 | ||
Q1–Q3 | 0.63–0.70 | 0.24–0.80 | 0.66–0.98 | 0.65–0.90 |
Parameter estimated assuming no inter-individual variations; Pop. parameters, parameters estimated using mixed-effect modeling (see Methods);
t0 was fixed to zero; SE, standard error; Q1–Q3: first and third quartiles of the distribution of the individual a posteriori estimates (see Supp. Materials); t0, HCV delay before decline begins; ε, SIL effectiveness in blocking viral production/release; δ, HCV-infected cell loss rate; η; SIL effectiveness in blocking viral infection; AIC; Akaike information criterion. The model with the lowest AIC is considered the best.