Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 18.
Published in final edited form as: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2011 Jan 6;1(1):55–63. doi: 10.1002/widm.14

Table 1.

Comparison of prediction performance of the initial random forest, the optimal sub-forest, and a previously established 70-gene classifier.

Method Error rate predicted
True		 Good Poor
Random
Forest		 26.0% Good 141 17
Poor 53 58
Smallest
forest		 26.0% Good 146 22
Poor 48 53
70-gene
Classifier		 35.3% Good 103 4
Poor 91 71