Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 18;7(4):e35352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035352

Table 3. Evaluative measures of model fit by the three models, and the Bollen-Stine bootstrap estimates for the 4-factor model in the 1119 validation sample of Chinese participants.

Confirmatory factor analysis BS bootstrapping 4-factor modelc
Good-of-fit indicesa 2-factor modelb 4-factor model 2nd-order factor model Mean 95% CId
SB scaled χ2 1065.276 452.2996 482.7125 176.2968e (142.94, 219.95)
df 151 146 147 146 -
p <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.1466f (0.0001, 0.5562)
GFI 0.8916 0.9512 0.9482 0.9838 (0.9799, 0.9868)
AGFI 0.8636 0.9366 0.933 0.9789 (0.9739, 0.9828)
SRMR 0.06124 0.04184 0.04511 0.0228 (0.0201, 0.0257)
NFI 0.897 0.9563 0.9533 0.9583 (0.9475, 0.9672)
NNFI 0.8982 0.9647 0.9616 0.9912 (0.9790, 1.0008)
CFI 0.9101 0.9699 0.967 0.9924 (0.9821, 1.0000)
RMSEA 0.07359 0.04332 0.0452 0.0124 (0.0000, 0.0213)
p (RMSEA<0.05) <0.001 0.9924 0.9602 - -

Notes:

a

SB scaled χ2 - Santorra-Bentler scaled χ2; df - degree of freedom; p - p value; GFI - Goodness-of-fit index; AGFI - Adjusted GFI; SRMR - Standard Root Mean Square Residuals; NFI - Normed Fit Index; NNFI - Non-normed Fit Index; CFI - Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA - Root Mean Square Error of Approximation.

b

Kring et al. (2004).

c

Based on 250 bootstrap sample of size 250.

d

95% Confidence Interval.

e

Model χ2 instead of SB scaled χ2.

f

127 of 250 bootstrap samples with p>0.05.