Skip to main content
. 2001 Apr 24;98(10):5827–5832. doi: 10.1073/pnas.091553398

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A schematic of AV interval dynamics without (a) and with (b) control. In both panels the schematic is superimposed over five series of AV intervals (annotated with different gray symbols) that correspond to consecutive control attempts at the same nominal VA interval in one alternans pacing and control trial. These AV intervals immediately followed control termination, and therefore obeyed f(AVn, Inline graphic) as they drifted away from the unstable steady state AV* and back into alternans. Thus, f(AVn, Inline graphic) was approximated by a quadratic curve fit to the AV intervals. The intersection of f(AVn, Inline graphic) with the line of identity (the diagonal line AVn+1 = AVn) is the unstable steady state AV*. Without control (a), the AV intervals alternate indefinitely between points 1 and 2 via the dynamic route depicted by the dotted lines, and never explore the unstable interior region of f(AVn, Inline graphic). b shows how the VA control perturbation of Eq. 3 shifts the function along the line of identity to the location of the dash-dot curve f(AVn, Inline graphic + δVAn). By doing so, point 1 becomes point 1′ (i.e., AVn+1 is increased). When the function is returned to f(AVn, Inline graphic) at the next beat (i.e., δVAn+1 = 0), control succeeds as the AV interval progresses to point 2, which is at the unstable steady state AV*.