Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 19;8(4):e1002477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002477

Table 1. Experimental validation of top-ranked Inline graphic predictions.

Name Sequence Inline graphic Ranking Experimental
(out of 2166) Inline graphic (Inline graphic)
kCAL01 Ac-WQVTRV 9 Inline graphic
kCAL02 Ac-WQFTRL Inline graphic Inline graphic
kCAL03 Ac-WQKTRL 2 Inline graphic
kCAL04 Ac-WQRTRL 5 Inline graphic
kCAL05 Ac-WQKTRI 4 Inline graphic
kCAL06 Ac-WQKTRV 1 Inline graphic
kCAL07 Ac-WQFTKL Inline graphic Inline graphic
kCAL08 Ac-WQRTRI 7 Inline graphic
kCAL09 Ac-WQLTKL 11 Inline graphic
kCAL10 Ac-WQKTKL 6 Inline graphic
kCAL11 Ac-WQRTRV 3 Inline graphic

†: Inline graphic values with a binding affinity higher than the best previously known hexamer (Inline graphic). These sequences are shown in green in Fig. 5.

‡: Sequence rank obtained by ordering the quantity: Inline graphic, where Inline graphic is the sequence rank from a design run using the Amber forcefield and Inline graphic is the sequence rank from a run using the Charmm forcefield.