Table 3.
Home | FMU | AMU | |
---|---|---|---|
All low risk women | |||
Cost difference (95% CI) | −565 (−591 to −538) | −196 (−229 to −163) | −170 (−199 to −141) |
Difference in adverse perinatal outcome* avoided (95% CI) | −0.00007 (−0.0014 to 0.0013) | 0.0004 (−0.0010 to 0.0019) | 0.0005 (−0.0007 to 0.0019) |
Mean ICER† | 7 950 356 | −431 873 | −296 400 |
Quadrant on cost effectiveness plane | South west | South east | South east |
Mean net benefit (95% CI)‡ | 592 (547 to 639) | 263 (211 to 315) | 167 (111 to 224) |
Mean net benefit (95% CI)§ | 593 (535 to 654) | 270 (205 to 334) | 174 (99 to 244) |
Nulliparous low risk women | |||
Cost difference (95% CI) | −281 (−343 to −217) | −163 (−217 to −108) | −92 (−142 to −33) |
Difference in adverse perinatal outcome* avoided (95% CI) | −0.004 (−0.008 to −0.00001) | 0.0008 (−0.002 to 0.003) | 0.0005 (−0.003 to 0.003) |
Mean ICER† | 69761 | −98136 | −47995 |
Quadrant on cost effectiveness plane | South west | South east | South east |
Mean net benefit (95% CI)‡ | 204 (77 to 319) | 179 (98 to 259) | 103 (9 to 189) |
Mean net benefit (95% CI)§ | 165 (−2 to 321) | 188 (87 to 289) | 110 (−10 to 217) |
Multiparous low risk women | |||
Cost difference (95% CI) | −362 (−390 to −335) | −173 (−208 to −139) | −151 (−184 to −117) |
Difference in adverse perinatal outcome* avoided (95% CI) | 0.001 (−0.0004 to 0.0025) | 0.0005 (−0.0015 to 0.0024) | 0.0007 (−0.001 to 0.003) |
Mean ICER† | −323 037 | −128 134 | −119 618 |
Quadrant on cost effectiveness plane | South east | South east | South east |
Mean net benefit (95% CI)‡ | 382 (336 to 427) | 182 (120 to 244) | 165 (115 to 222) |
Mean net benefit (95% CI)§ | 391 (335 to 451) | 186 (107 to 267) | 172 (108 to 244) |
*Composite of perinatal mortality and specified neonatal morbidities: stillbirth after start of care in labour, early neonatal death, neonatal encephalopathy, meconium aspiration syndrome, brachial plexus injury, fractured humerus, or fractured clavicle.
†95% CI not provided because bootstrapped replicates of incremental cost effectiveness ratios fell across more than one quadrant of cost effectiveness plane.
‡Estimated at £20 000 cost effectiveness threshold.
§Estimated at £30 000 cost effectiveness threshold.