Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 19;344:e2292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2292

Table 6.

 Incremental cost effectiveness ratios and net benefit statistics for normal birth outcome in women at low risk of complications according to planned place of birth: home, freestanding midwifery unit (FMU), or alongside midwifery unit (AMU) with obstetric unit (OU) as reference

Home FMU AMU
All low risk women
Cost difference (95% CI) −590 (−618 to −563) −247 (−280 to −211) −154 (−190 to −118)
Difference in normal birth* (95% CI) 0.300 (0.290 to 0.310) 0.256 (0.245 to 0.268) 0.184 (0.173 to 0.194)
Mean ICER (95% CI) −1960 (−2034 to −1890) −956 (−1076 to −847) −836 (−1002 to −664)
Quadrant on cost effectiveness plane South east South east South east
Mean net benefit (95% CI)† 6609 (6411 to 6810) 5377 (5133 to 5618) 3828 (3600 to 4052)
Mean net benefit (95% CI)‡ 9618 (9334 to 9909) 7941 (7585 to 8298) 5663 (5332 to 5992)
Low risk women without complicating conditions
Cost difference (95% CI) −504 (−535 to −474) −150 (−187 to −116) −69 (−105 to −36)
Difference in normal birth* (95% CI) 0.266 (0.256 to 0.275) 0.218 (0.207 to 0.229) 0.149 (0.138 to 0.160)
Mean ICER (95% CI) −1897 (−1985 to −1812) −689 (−823 to −538) −464 (−685 to −254)
Quadrant on cost effectiveness plane South east South east South east
Mean net benefit (95% CI)† 5822 (5612 to 6036) 4507 (4285 to 4766) 3042 (2812 to 3307)
Mean net benefit (95% CI)‡ 8483 (8178 to 8788) 6688 (6367 to 7057) 4526 (4188 to 4911)

*Normal birth defined by Maternity Care Working Party as birth without any of induction of labour; epidural or spinal analgesia; general anaesthetic; episiotomy; forceps, ventouse, or caesarean section.

†Estimated at £20 000 cost effectiveness threshold.

‡Estimated at £30 000 cost effectiveness threshold.