Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 Jan 11;36(6):590–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01698.x

Table 1.

Twin pair agreement in rating presence or absence of biological parent alcohol problems for narrow versus broad ratings.

TOTAL Narrow Rating
Broad Rating
Concordant Positive Discordant Concordant Positive Discordant
Na N % N % ρ S.E. N % N % ρ S.E.

Maternal Alcohol Problems
MZ Female Pairs - EA 846–848 31 3.7 28 3.3 0.93# 0.03 44 5.2 37 4.8 0.92 0.02
AA 111 5 4.5 7 6.3 0.86 0.10 9 8.1 10 9.0 0.85 0.08
DZ Female Pairs - EA 656–657 18 2.7 35 5.3 0.81 0.06 33 5.0 39 5.9 0.87 0.04
AA 141 6 4.3 15 10.6 0.68 0.14 11 7.8 17 12.1 0.76 0.10
Paternal Alcohol Problems
MZ Female Pairs - EA 821–829 91 11.1 96 11.7 0.83 0.03 139 16.8 96 11.6 0.88 0.02
AA 100–101 15 15.0 21 21.0 0.69 0.11 25 24.8 27 26.7 0.64* 0.11
DZ Female Pairs - EA 636–642 72 11.3 80 12.6 0.82 0.04 113 17.6 78 12.2 0.88 0.02
AA 130–131 22 17.0 21 16.2 0.80 0.07 30 22.9 24 18.3 0.80 0.07

ρ = tetrachoric correlation; SE = standard error;

a

Ns for narrow-broad ratings;

#

MZ versus DZ agreement differs significantly by twin pair zygosity, in comparisons within ethnicity groups (EA: 0.93 vs. 0.81, p <. 05);

*

agreement differs significantly by ethnicity, in comparisons within zygosity groups (MZ: 0.88 vs. 0.64, p < .01).