Table 1.

Results of the different ANOVAs used to compare the performance of the sham, anodal, and cathodal groups

	Factors	F statistics	p Value
Force
T1 during learning	Group	F(2,24) = 0.34	0.71
	Block	F(1,24) = 6.34	0.02
	Group × block	F(2,24) = 0.6	0.56
T1 during test	Group	F(2,24) = 0.78	0.47
	Bin	F(11,14) = 14.14	0.00001
	Group × bin	F(22,28) = 1.27	0.27
Generalization index
First three movements	Group	F(2,24) = 3.15	0.06
	Target	F(1,24) = 25.31	0.00004
	Group × target	F(2,24) = 4.3	0.025
T2 during learning	Group	F(2,24) = 0.16	0.86
	Block	F(1,24) = 1.13	0.3
	Group × block	F(2,24) = 0.47	0.63
T2 during test	Group	F(2,24) = 0.14	0.87
	Bin	F(11,14) = 2.14	0.09
	Group × bin	F(22,28) = 0.63	0.86
T3 during learning	Group	F(2,24) = 1.12	0.34
	Block	F(1,24) = 1.8	0.19
	Group × block	F(2,24) = 2.97	0.07
T3 during test	Group	F(2,24) = 5.67	0.01
	Bin	F(11,14) = 4.21	0.007
	Group × bin	F(22,28) = 0.77	0.73
Kinematic measures
Maximum perpendicular deviation	Group	F(2,24) = 1.17	0.33
	Set	F(5,20) = 17.41	<0.00001
	Group × set	F(10,40) = 0.97	0.48
Initial perpendicular velocity	Group	F(2,24) = 0.49	0.61
	Set	F(5,20) = 1.91	0.14
	Group × set	F(10,40) = 0.57	0.83

Boldface highlights important comparisons.