Skip to main content
. 2011 May 11;31(19):7102–7110. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0273-11.2011

Table 2.

Results of the different ANOVAs used to compare the performance of the anodal M1, cathodal M1, anodal PPC, and cathodal PPC groups

Generalization index Factors F statistic p Value
First three movements Area F(1,28) = 9.51 0.005
Polarity F(1,28) = 0.66 0.42
Target F(1,28) = 53.75 <0.00001
Area × polarity F(1,28) = 0.22 0.64
Area × target F(1,28) = 5.01 0.033
Polarity × target F(1,28) = 0.37 0.55
Area × polarity × target F(1,28) < 0.0001 0.998
T2 during learning Area F(1,28) = 1.01 0.32
Polarity F(1,28) = 0.12 0.74
Block F(1,28) = 0.73 0.4
Area × polarity F(1,28) = 0.26 0.62
Area × block F(1,28) = 0.61 0.44
Polarity × block F(1,28) = 0.65 0.43
Area × polarity × block F(1,28) = 0.21 0.65
T2 during test Area F(1,28) = 2.27 0.14
Polarity F(1,28) = 0.6 0.45
Bin F(11,18) = 2.45 0.044
Area × polarity F(1,28) = 0.8 0.38
Area × bin F(11,18) = 1.06 0.44
Polarity × bin F(11,18) = 0.87 0.58
Area × polarity × bin F(11,18) = 1.56 0.2
T3 during learning Area F(1,28) = 3.2 0.084
Polarity F(1,28) = 0.53 0.47
Block F(1,28) = 0.74 0.4
Area × polarity F(1,28) = 0.02 0.88
Area × block F(1,28) = 1.6 0.22
Polarity × block F(1,28) = 0.64 0.43
Area × polarity × block F(1,28) = 0.02 0.89
T3 during test Area F(1,28) = 13.9 0.0009
Polarity F(1,28) = 0.2 0.65
Bin F(11,18) = 12.37 <0.00001
Area × polarity F(1,28) = 0.12 0.28
Area × bin F(11,18) = 0.97 0.5
Polarity × bin F(11,18) = 1.03 0.46
Area × polarity × bin F(11,18) = 0.97 0.56

Boldfance indicates •.