Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 3;302(8):H1636–H1644. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00742.2011

Table 1.

Comparison of Ca2+ handling properties in the two EAD models

Model CaT at Control CaT After Treatment Spontaneous CaT/CaW SR Content at Control SR Content After Treatment
H2O2 1.56 ± 0.27 (48) 1.54 ± 0.32 (42) 1.26 ± 0.09 (27) 1.67 ± 0.57 (19) 1.52 ± 0.35 (19)
Iso + BayK 1.44 ± 0.20 (44) 1.75 ± 0.37* (49) 1.65 ± 0.24 (32) 1.62 ± 0.35 (26) 1.99 ± 0.54 (24)

Values are means ± SD; numbers of calcium transients (CaTs) measured from multiple cells are indicated in the parenthesis. Amplitude (F/F0) of CaT, spontaneous CaT/calcium wave (CaW), and 10-mM caffeine-induced calcium release [sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) content] are listed.

EAD, early afterdepolarization; Iso, isoproterenol; BayK, BayK 8644.

*

P < 0.01, compared with CaT at control;

P < 0.01, compared with CaT after treatment;

P < 0.01, compared with SR content at control.