Skip to main content
. 2001 Apr 24;98(10):5892–5897. doi: 10.1073/pnas.101618098

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Restoration of retrograde coupling after insertion of α1S residues 720–764 into the Musca II-III loop (chimera GFP-SkLMS45). (A) Representative whole-cell Ca2+ currents recorded from dysgenic myotubes expressing GFP-α1S (Left), GFP-SkLM (Center), and GFP-SkLMS45 (Right). After a prepulse to inactivate T type currents (24), macroscopic Ca2+ currents were elicited by 200-ms step depolarizations from a holding potential of −80 mV to the indicated test potentials. Current amplitudes were normalized by linear cell capacitance and are expressed as pA/pF. (B) Representative immobilization-resistant intramembrane charge movements measured at +40 mV after blocking Ca2+ currents with 0.5 mM Cd2+ and 0.1 mM La3+, recorded from cells expressing the same three constructs shown above. (C) Average maximal Ca2+ conductance (Gmax, Left) and charge movement (Qmax, Right) and ratios of Gmax/QInline graphic (Center) for GFP-α1S, GFP-SkLM, and GFP-SkLMS45. The asterisk indicates a statistically significant (P < 0. 001) difference in average Gmax from the other two constructs after comparison by an unpaired two-sample t test. No asterisk indicates lack of statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). (Bars = mean ± SEM of 12–20 recordings.)