Table 5.
Similarity of synergies across 3 protocols (n = 8)
| Comparison conditions (protocol 1 vs. protocol 2) | Nsyn | Similarity index | VAF (%) | Muscle VAF (%) | VAFsh (%) | Muscle VAFsh (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spatial vs. Load | ||||||
| protocol 1 | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 97.5 ± 1.0 | 96.7 ± 2.3 | 97.1 ± 0.9 | 96.6 ± 2.5 |
| protocol 2 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 97.0 ± 0.8 | 96.5 ± 2.4 | 96.7 ± 0.8 | 96.3 ± 2.4 | |
| Spatial vs. Position | ||||||
| protocol 1 | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 97.5 ± 0.7 | 95.7 ± 3.5 | 97.1 ± 1.0 | 96.4 ± 2.9 |
| protocol 2 | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 96.4 ± 1.5 | 96.6 ± 2.7 | 93.8 ± 2.6 | 93.1 ± 5.7 | |
| Load vs. Position | ||||||
| protocol 1 | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 1.00 ± 0.00 | 97.3 ± 0.8 | 95.2 ± 3.8 | 96.4 ± 1.1 | 95.9 ± 3.3 |
| protocol 2 | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 96.7 ± 1.4 | 96.7 ± 2.7 | 93.9 ± 2.9 | 93.3 ± 5.9 |
All numbers are represented as mean ± SD.