Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 19;7(4):e35307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035307

Table 1. Group statistics of the GWAS and the replication study cohorts.

GWAS validation Replication study
Enrolled After TaqMan® filtration Enrolled After TaqMan® filtration
N Range Median N Range Median N Range Median N Range Median
PCa 135 45–83 67 118 45–83 58 447 42–83 67 419 42–83 67
AD 525 27–85 59 476 27–85 59 945 32–85 60 856 36–85 60
AD (F) 270 28–85 58 242 28–85 58 509 32–85 60 454 40–85 60
AD (M) 255 27–85 60 234 27–85 60 436 36–85 61 402 36–85 61
CRC 630 29–86 65 598 29–86 65 889 28–89 64 840 29–89 64
CRC (F) 240 29–86 63 234 29–86 63 352 29–89 63 341 29–89 63
CRC (M) 390 32–84 66 364 32–84 66 537 28–85 65 499 30–85 65
Control - PCa 270 27–81 55 261 27–81 55 800 27–86 59 772 27–86 59
Control - AD/CRC 690 27–81 57 669 27–81 57 2188 21–87 58 1981 21–87 58
Control - AD/CRC (F) 420 40–77 58 408 40–77 58 1542 21–87 58 1399 21–87 58
Control - AD/CRC (M) 270 27–81 55 261 27–81 55 646 24–82 57.5 582 24–82 57

The GWAS validation panel indicates numbers of patients (N) enrolled in the GWAS, after excluding microarrays that did not meet quality control criteria based on the PCA results. The ‘Range’ and ‘Median’ values regard age of cases and controls in respective groups. Both GWAS validation and replication analyses were done using respective individual patient TaqMan® genotyping. The TaqMan® genotyping data was subjected to a quality filtration using the 5% threshold of per-individual maximum genotype missingness (see ‘Statistical analyses – individual genotyping’).