Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Antiviral Res. 2012 Feb 15;94(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2012.02.001

Table 2.

Prophylactic and therapeutic activity of m2C9, 2C9-H4 cIgG, and 2C9-H4 cIgM in 17D-204-challenged AG129 mice.

Treatmenta Survivors/Total Mice (% Survivors) Brain Viral Loadb ASTc
Survivors Dead
PBS Controls 1/27 (4) n.a. 6.9 (0.6) 17.3 (4.3)
Prophylaxis Day -1
m2C9 IgG 18/19 (95)d 1.2 (0.8)e 7.0 30.4 (2.5)d
2C9-H4 IgG 18/25 (72)d 0.7 (0.4)e 6.7 28.3 (4.5)d
2C9-H4 IgM 2/10 (20) 6.0 (0.1)f 7.7 (0.3) 20.6 (5.9)
Treatment Day 1
m2C9 IgG 7/10 (70)d 2.0 (2.0)e 7.4 (3.0) 25.8 (8.8)d
2C9- H4 IgG 3/15 (20) 1.7d 6.7 (0.5) 19.4 (7.0)
Treatment Day 3
m2C9 IgG 0/10 (0) n.a. 6.6 (0.3) 15.8 (2.8)
2C9-H4 IgG 0/15 (0) n.a. 6.7 4) 15.3 (2.0)
a

Mice were inoculated i.p. with 127 μg purified MAb 24 hours pre-infection or 24 or 72 hours post-infection by an i.p. viral challenge.

b

Expressed as mean (s.d.) genomic copies (log10)/g tissue.

c

Experiments were terminated at 31 days post-infection. Average survival time (AST) in days (s.d.).

d

ρ <0.05 by two-tailed t-test statistic vs. PBS control mice.

e

ρ <0.05 by two-tailed t-test statistic vs. paired PBS control mice or paired dead mice.

f

ρ <0.05 by two-tailed t-test statistic vs. paired dead mice only.