Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Psychol. 2012 Mar 2;65(1):1–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.01.003

Table 1.

Global and local ratings of semantic coherence across panels

Normal Semantic Only Structural Only Scrambled

Global 6.13 (.72) 3.56 (1.1) 2.66 (.73) 2.39 (.69)

Positions All Targets All Targets All Targets All Targets
1--2 5.80 (.93) 6.09 (1.2) 4.44 (1) 3.72 (1.6) 3.05 (.99) 2.71 (1.5) 2.54 (1.1) 2.31 (1.3)
2--3 5.54 (1) 5.39 (1.7) 3.21 (1) 3.44 (1.6) 2.48 (.93) 2.86 (1.8) 4.94 (.86) 2.4 (1.3)
3--4 5.59 (.94) 5.69 (1.4) 2.56 (1) 3.89 (1.7) 4.70 (.78) 2.81 (1.4) 3.59 (.94) 2.55 (1.5)
4--5 5.66 (.94) 5.75 (1.3) 4.05 (.76) 3.47 (1.5) 3.78 (.91) 2.94 (1.5) 2.65 (.99) 2.43 (1.4)
5--6 5.40 (.96) 5.15 (1.8) 4.19 (1.0) 3.53 (1.5) 2.84 (.96) 2.64 (1.4) 2.46 (1.1) 2.36 (1.4)

Ave Local 5.59 (.83) 5.61 (1.5) 3.57 (.83) 3.61 (1.6) 2.68 (.91) 2.79 (1.5) 2.46 (.95) 2.41 (1.4)

Mean ratings for semantic coherence for each sequence type (on a scale of 1–7). Global ratings are for each type of sequence as a whole. Local ratings are shown for all adjacent pairs of panels as well as more specifically for Targets and their immediately preceding panel.