Skip to main content
. 2010 May 12;30(19):6751–6762. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5080-09.2010

Table 2.

Numbers of mice examined from each genotype for each of the physiological and histological analyses performed in the present study

M1 M3 M5 M2 M4 M2/M4
Thresholds (ABR/DPOAE) +/+ = 26 +/+ = 29 +/+ = 22 +/+ = 16 +/+ = 16 +/+ = 10
−/− = 13 −/− = 13 −/− = 14 −/− = 8 −/− = 8 −/− = 11
Efferent function +/+ = 4 +/+ = 8 +/+ = 4 +/+ = 5
−/− = 5 −/− = 10 −/− = 3 −/− = 6
Temporary noise damage +/+ = 4 +/+ = 6 +/+ = 6 +/+ = 6 +/+ = 6 +/+ = 7
−/− = 3 −/− = 3 −/− = 4 −/− = 4 −/− = 4 −/− = 7
Permanent noise damage +/+ = 4 +/+ = 8 +/+ = 8 +/+ = 8 +/+ = 8 +/+ = 7
−/− = 3 −/− = 5 −/− = 8 −/− = 8 −/− = 8 −/− = 7
Cochlear histopathology +/+ = 3 +/+ = 3 +/+ = 3 +/+ = 2
−/− = 5 −/− = 3 −/− = 3 −/− = 2

Histopathology and efferent function were not evaluated in the M2 or M4 single nulls, once we determined that the double nulls (M2/M4) were normal by both these assays.