Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 16;2(2):e000764. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000764

Table 4.

Psychological distress (POMS) at 14 months and mean differences between groups (95 CI%)

Outcome variable n Mean range Mean (95% CI) Mean difference (95% CI) p Value
Anger/hostility 0–28
 Control group 223 2.03 (1.59 to 2.48)
 Intervention group 230 1.88 (1.43 to 2.33) −0.15 (−0.79 to 0.48) 0.64
Confusion/bewilderment 0–20
 Control group 229 2.45 (2.04 to 2.86)
 Intervention group 231 2.11 (1.69 to 2.53) −0.34 (−0.92 to 0.25) 0.26
Depression/dejection 0–32
 Control group 223 3.85 (3.20 to 4.51)
 Intervention group 229 3.26 (2.61 to 3.92) −0.59 (−1.52 to 0.34) 0.21
Fatigue/inertia 0–20
 Control group 226 4.65 (4.08 to 5.22)
 Intervention group 234 4.14 (3.02 to 4.10) −0.51 (−1.32 to 0.29) 0.21
Tension/anxiety 0–24
 Control group 226 3.82 (3.28 to 4.36)
 Intervention group 233 3.56 (3.02 to 4.10) −0.26 (−1.02 to 0.50) 0.50
Vigour/activity 0–24
 Control group 218 10.28 (9.51 to 11.05)
 Intervention group 228 10.09 (9.31 to 10.86) −0.20 (−1.29 to 0.89) 0.72
Total mood disturbance 0–124
 Control group 200 4.87 (2.29 to 7.45)
 Intervention group 210 4.19 (1.62 to 6.76) −0.68 (−4.32 to 2.97) 0.72

Mean values of each subscale depends on the number of items related to the individual subscale which varies from 5 to 8, each item ranging from 0 to 4. Total mood disturbance is calculated by summing up the scores on the five negative symptom subscales and subtracting the score on the one positively scored subscale, vigour/activity. A higher score indicates a higher degree of symptoms/feelings within the related subscale.

POMS, Profile of Mood States.