Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 25;132(3):1049–1062. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1895-2

Table 3.

Correlations among the molecular signatures

Correlation coefficient
Concordance
(P value)
p53 wt 70-Gene low Luminal Wound-quiescent ROR-S low
HR+, HER2− 0.44 0.26 0.62 0.34 0.40
0.72 0.63 0.81 0.68 0.71
(<0.001) (0.002) (<0.001) (<0.001) (<0.001)
p53 wt 0.32 0.65 0.55 0.56
0.59 0.83 0.73 0.74
(<0.001) (<0.001) (<0.001) (<0.001)
70-Gene low 0.33 0.41 0.54
0.61 0.82 0.83
(<0.001) (<0.001) (<0.001)
Luminal 0.40 0.55
0.68 0.75
(<0.001) (<0.001)
Wound-quiescent 0.63
0.86
(<0.001)

HR hormone receptor, wt wild type, ROR-S risk of relapse score. Signatures are shown as dichotomies: HR+/HER2− vs. not, luminal (A and B) vs. the other intrinsic subtypes (HER2 enriched, basal, and normal-like), p53 wild type vs. mutation, 70-gene prognosis low vs. high (only 13 (9%) patients are in the low risk prognosis group), and wound-quiescent vs. wound-activated. Concordance refers to the lower risk subsets