Table 3.
Considerations for clinical decision-making
Supporting denosumab use | Supporting IV bisphosphonate use |
---|---|
Improved efficacy Better tolerability Longer time to development of moderate or severe bone pain (better prevention of pain) Safer in patients with progressive or baseline renal insufficiency
Patients currently receiving an IV bisphosphonate who experience an SRE Patients with elevated urinary NTx level despite bisphosphonate therapy Ease of subcutaneous administration
|
Lower risk hypocalcemia Safer in patients unlikely to be compliant with oral vitamin D and calcium supplements Possibly lower risk ONJ Lower cost Greater than 10 years of experience with use in the medical community |
Abbreviations: IV, intravenous; SRE, skeletal-related events; NTx, collagen type 1 crosslinked N-telopeptide; ONJ, osteonecrosis of the jaw.