Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 12;6:89–99. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S20677

Table 3.

Considerations for clinical decision-making

Supporting denosumab use Supporting IV bisphosphonate use
Improved efficacy
Better tolerability
Longer time to development of moderate or severe bone pain (better prevention of pain)
Safer in patients with progressive or baseline renal insufficiency
  • Patients receiving nephrotoxic chemotherapy, ie, platinum chemotherapies

  • Patients with diseases more susceptible to renal dysfunction (ie, prostate cancer)

Patients with intolerance to bisphosphonates
Patients currently receiving an IV bisphosphonate who experience an SRE
Patients with elevated urinary NTx level despite bisphosphonate therapy
Ease of subcutaneous administration
  • Patients without port-a-cath or easy IV access

  • Patients not receiving monthly chemotherapy infusion

Lower risk hypocalcemia
Safer in patients unlikely to be compliant with oral vitamin D and calcium supplements
Possibly lower risk ONJ
Lower cost
Greater than 10 years of experience with use in the medical community

Abbreviations: IV, intravenous; SRE, skeletal-related events; NTx, collagen type 1 crosslinked N-telopeptide; ONJ, osteonecrosis of the jaw.