Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Commun Disord. 2012 Feb 6;45(3):198–211. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.01.004

Table 1.

Results of repeated measures ANOVA showing protected post hoc comparisons between baseline and FI conditions separately for each group (top), and between participant groups separately for each phase (bottom). Double asterisks indicate tests significant at FDR q=.01.

Baseline (A) phases versus fluency-inducing (B) phases, by group
PWS Group CONT Group
%SS SFSPM Na Effort SFSPM Na Effort
Masking ** ** * ** NS NS NS
Chorus ** NS ** ** ** ** **
Whispering ** ** NS ** ** ** *
Rhythm ** NS NS ** ** ** **
PWS group versus CONT group, by phase
Baseline (A phases) FI Conditions (B phases)
SFSPM Na Effort SFSPM Na Effort
Masking ** ** ** ** ** **
Chorus ** ** ** NS NS NS
Whispering ** ** ** ** ** NS
Rhythm ** ** ** NS NS NS

Note. %SS = observer-judged percent syllables stuttered; SFSPM = observer-judged stutterfree speech rate; NA = observer-judged speech naturalness, 1–9; EFFORT = self-rated speech effort, 1–9. PWS = Persons who stutter; CONT = Control group.