Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 18;15(5):R216. doi: 10.1186/cc10451

Table 4.

Accuracy of stroke volume and cardiac output changes after passive leg raising to predict fluid responsivenessa

Criteria Sensitivity Specificity LR+ LR- PPV NPV
ΔPLRSV > 3% 92% (64 to 100) 67% (35 to 90) 2.7 (1.8 to 4.3) 0.12 (0.01 to 0.9) 75% (48 to 93) 89% (49 to 100)
ΔPLRSV > 5% 92% (64 to 100) 83% (52 to 98) 5.5 (4.1 to 7.7) 0.09 (0.01 to 0.9) 86% (57 to 98) 91% (59 to 100)
ΔPLRSV > 10% 62% (32 to 86) 92% (62 to 100) 7.3 (4.7 to 11.7) 0.42 (0.06 to 3.1) 89% (52 to 100) 69% (40 to 90)
ΔPLRSV > 15% 39% (14 to 68) 92% (62 to 100) 4.6 (2.3 to 9.4) 0.67 (0.1 to 4.6) 83% 36 to 100) 58% (34 to 80)
ΔPLRCO > 3% 92% (64 to 100) 67% (35 to 90) 2.8 (1.8 to 4.3) 0.12 (0.01 to 0.9) 75% (48 to 93) 89% (49 to 100)
ΔPLRCO > 5% 85% (46 to 95) 83% (52 to 98) 5 (3.6 to 7.2) 0.18 (0.03 to 1.1) 85% (55 to 98) 83% (52 to 98)
ΔPLRCO > 8% 69% (39 to 91) 83% (52 to 98) 4.1 (2.7 to 6.5) 0.37 (0.08 to 1.7) 82% (48 to 98) 71% (42 to 92)
ΔPLRCO > 12% 54% (25 to 81) 83% (52 to 98) 3.2 (1.8 to 5.7) 0.55 (0.1 to 2.2) 78% (38 to 98) 63% (35 to 85)

aLR+, positive likelihood ratio; LR-, negative likelihood ratio; PPV; positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; ΔPLRSV, stroke volume increase from baseline and after passive leg raising; ΔPLRCO, increase of cardiac output increase from baseline and after passive leg raising. Data are raw numbers and CI95 ranges.