Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 23;7(4):e35424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035424

Table 1. Origin of the samples used either in the GWAS mining, or genotyped in the replication samples.

Phenotype Sample (reference) Application Cases Controls No. of markers Covariate code Genotyping platform
SCZ German [30] GWAS mining 484 1300* 135 2 Illumina 550v3
SCZ British [34] GWAS mining 479 2937** 85 12 Affymetrix GC500K
SCZ Danish [32] Genotyping 481 826 129 8 Illumina Golden Gate
SCZ Norwegian [32] Genotyping 160 269 129 9 Illumina Golden Gate
BP German [35] GWAS mining 682 1300* 107 2 Illumina 550v3
BP British [36] GWAS mining 1868 2937** 107 12 Affymetrix GC500K
BP American [38] GWAS mining 461 563 109 n.a. Pools Illumina 550
BP Bosnian/Serbian [35] Replication 124 115 20 1 Sequenom Massarray
BP German [35] Replication 378 768 20 3 Sequenom Massarray
BP Spanish [35] Replication 298 400 20 4 Sequenom Massarray
BP Polish [35] Replication 446 558 20 5 Sequenom Massarray
BP Romanian [35] Replication 237 234 20 6 Sequenom Massarray
BP Russian [35] Replication 331 332 20 7 Sequenom Massarray
ADHD Norwegian [31] Genotyping 466 515 35 10 Sequenom Massarray
ADHD German [33] GWAS mining 495 1300* 17 11 Illumina 660

The number of cases and controls, number of markers mined/genotyped and the genotyping technology is shown. The covariate code takes into consideration the possible effect of country of origin and platform used in the genotypic analysis.

*

Same control samples used,

**

same control samples used. n.a., not applicable as the sample was not used for the merged analyses.