Table 2.
Reflex force experiments data summary
Peak F ankle |
|||
---|---|---|---|
90° (N) (n = 24) | >90° (N) (n = 24) | <90° (N) (n = 24) | |
Push–pull | |||
RC_1 | 11.8 | 9.4 | 10 |
RC_2 | 8.7 | 8.3 | 6.7 |
RC_3 | 24.7 | 24.8 | 17.3 |
RC_4 | 10.1 | 12.4 | 9.9 |
RC_5 | 14.2 | 14.8 | 14.1 |
Average | 13.9 | 13.9 | 11.6 |
Non-push–pull | |||
RC_1 | 9.5 | 7.3 | 9.1 |
RC_2 | 6.1 | 4.4 | 5.6 |
RC_3 | 19.8 | 16.5 | 15.5 |
RC_4 | 8.5 | 7.5 | 8.6 |
RC_5 | 12.2 | 11.2 | 12.5 |
Average | 11.2 | 9.38 | 10.3 |
%Δ | 24.11 (±10.4) | 48.19 (±22.2) | 12.6 (±3.8) |
t test | 0.04 | 0.0007 | 0.13 |
When antagonist muscles are held at a position equivalent to an ankle angle of 90°, the force gain increase afforded by stretching and shortening the muscles in a push–pull configuration is about 24% (first column). If the antagonist muscles are initially held a length corresponding to an ankle angle greater than 90° (5 mm longer), push–pull coupling provides a gain of 48%. If the experiment is started with antagonist muscles shorter than they would be at an ankle angle of 90°, the push–pull gain increase is only 12% (last column). RC_1, Reflex cat 1; RC_2, reflex cat 2; etc.