Table 3.
Neurorehabilitation Strategy/Compensatory Training Studies
First author (year) | NC | NE | Age | Sample | Deficit | Strategy | Effect Sizes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Category | Stat | Effect | Size | |||||||
Niemeier (1998) | 15 | 16 | 45–77 | Stroke | Visual inattention/neglect | Visual imagery (sweeping eye movements) | RM | d | ↓ visual search errors | 0.91 |
IG p-p | d | ↑ attention | 1.04 | |||||||
Kerkoff (1994) | — | 22 | 16–77 | Stroke | Homonymous visual field defectsa | Compensatory eye saccades and visual search strategies | RM | — | ↓ visual search errors | — |
RM | — | ↑visual search | — | |||||||
RM | — | ↑ activities of daily living | — | |||||||
Pambakian (2004) | — | 29 | 24–75 | Stroke | Homonymous visual field defectsa | Visual search | RM | — | ↓ visual search time | — |
RM | — | ↑ activities of daily living | — | |||||||
Kaschel (2002) | 12 | 9 | 20–60 | TBI | Memory | Visual imagery mnemonics | IG p-p | d | ↑ delayed recall | 1.17b |
IG p-p | d | ↑ everyday memory | 0.73b | |||||||
Berg (1991) | 11 | 17 | 19–58 | TBI | Memory | Making associations, organization, and matching encoding and retrieval contexts | IG p-p | f2 | ↑ acquisition memory | 0.04c |
IG p-p | f2 | ↑ delayed recall | 0.06c | |||||||
Fasotti (2000) | 10 | 12 | 18–45 | TBI | Mental slowness | Decision planning, task management, and delineating tasks hierarchically | IG p-p | d | ↑ memory | 0.40 |
IG p-p | d | ↑ attention | 0.52 | |||||||
van Heugten (1998) | — | 33 | 39–91 | Stroke | Apraxia | Verbalizing the steps in an action | RM | d | ↑ activities of daily living | 1.30 |
RM | d | ↑ motor functioning | 0.57 | |||||||
RM | d | ↓ apraxia symptoms | 0.59 |
Note. Age is given in years. See Supplementary Material for definitions and procedures for determining the effect sizes (Stat) based on the parameters given in the original studies. All effect sizes were calculated.
NC = sample size of the control group; NE = sample size of the experimental/strategy group; TBI = traumatic brain injury; IG p-p = independent groups, pre-post; RM = repeated measures, change within group; Stat = the effect size statistic given; d = Cohen’s d; f 2 = Cohen’s f2.
A loss of visual perception in one half of the field of vision.
Effect stable at follow-up test.
Effect reported from follow-up test.