Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Apr 24.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr;17(4):e121–e147.

Table 4.

Proportion of Hospitals Meeting Selected “Meaningful Use Criteria” in the High, Intermediate, and Low Quality Grades

Meaningful Use Objectives High Quality (N = 166) Intermediate Quality (N = 1318) Low Quality (N = 153) Difference (high - low) p-value*
Core Set Percent
 Computerized Order Entry 43 35 30 13 0.05
 Implement Drug-Drug, Drug-Allergy Checks 25 17 13 12 0.02
 Maintain Up-to-date Problem Lists 61 54 48 13 0.08
 Maintain Active Medication Lists 88 78 73 15 <0.01
 Give Patients an Electronic Copy of Discharge Summaries 80 74 70 10 0.16
 Record Key Demographics 96 94 91 5 0.21
 Report Hospital Quality Measures to State or CMS 41 30 34 7 0.02
 Implement at Least One of Four Clinical Decision Rules 84 72 63 21 <0.001
 Have Capability to Exchange Key Clinical Information 60 54 42 18 <0.01
All nine core criteria 2.1 3.5 1.1 1.0 0.13
Menu Set
 Incorporate Clinical Lab-Test Results Into EHR As Structured Data 93 96 95 −2 0.50
 Perform Medication Reconciliation 68 63 57 11 0.5
 Record Advanced Directives 67 58 52 15 0.02
All 3 menu criteria 50.2 42.1 33.8 16.4 0.01
All 9 core and all 3 menu criteria 1.6 2.7 1.1 0.5 0.28
*

P-values for comparisons across all three groups.