Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 8;2011:707325. doi: 10.1155/2011/707325

Table 3.

Comparisons of volume of spleen in different population and by different techniques.

Authors Techniques Population Mean volume of spleen (cm³) Range (cm³)
Liu et al. [11] Multidetector CT scan Chinese 190.94 ± 70.37
Prassopoulos et al. [12] Summation-area technique (CT scan) European 214.6 107.2–314
Mazonakis et al. [13] Random marking on MR scan European 208.0 mL 115–293.6 mL
Manual planimetry on MR scan European 204.8 mL 117.9–289.8 mL
Hidaka et al. [14] 3D USG Japanese 104 mL
Zhang et al. [15] Radionuclide scan 185
Hoefs et al. [16] Liver-spleen scan American 201 ± 77
Henderson et al. [17] Summation-area of CT scan European 209 ± 76
Picardi et al. [18] USG European 140 mL 60–200 mL
Loftus et al. [19] Water displacement European 110 ± 70 26–250
Lamb et al. [7] USG & CT –prolate ellipsoid European 107–314
Spielmann et al. [20] USG-prolate ellipsoid American 333.6 ± 116.1