Table 3.
Comparisons of volume of spleen in different population and by different techniques.
Authors | Techniques | Population | Mean volume of spleen (cm³) | Range (cm³) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Liu et al. [11] | Multidetector CT scan | Chinese | 190.94 ± 70.37 | — |
Prassopoulos et al. [12] | Summation-area technique (CT scan) | European | 214.6 | 107.2–314 |
Mazonakis et al. [13] | Random marking on MR scan | European | 208.0 mL | 115–293.6 mL |
Manual planimetry on MR scan | European | 204.8 mL | 117.9–289.8 mL | |
Hidaka et al. [14] | 3D USG | Japanese | 104 mL | — |
Zhang et al. [15] | Radionuclide scan | — | 185 | — |
Hoefs et al. [16] | Liver-spleen scan | American | 201 ± 77 | — |
Henderson et al. [17] | Summation-area of CT scan | European | 209 ± 76 | — |
Picardi et al. [18] | USG | European | 140 mL | 60–200 mL |
Loftus et al. [19] | Water displacement | European | 110 ± 70 | 26–250 |
Lamb et al. [7] | USG & CT –prolate ellipsoid | European | — | 107–314 |
Spielmann et al. [20] | USG-prolate ellipsoid | American | 333.6 ± 116.1 | — |