Table 2.
Factor | Model 1‡ |
Model 2§ |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
β | p-value | β | p-value | |
Intercept | −2.90 | <.0001 | −2.67 | <.0001 |
Year 2004 | 0.19 | <.0001 | −0.04 | 0.64 |
Year 2006 | 0.88 | <.0001 | 0.56 | <.0001 |
Year 2009 | 1.36 | <.0001 | 1.12 | <.0001 |
Middle income | 0.27 | <.0001 | 0.14 | 0.06 |
High income | 0.65 | <.0001 | 0.22 | 0.002 |
High education | 0.25 | <.0001 | 0.25 | <.0001 |
Age 7–12y | −0.48 | <.0001 | −0.47 | <.0001 |
Age 13–18y | −0.90 | <.0001 | −0.91 | <.0001 |
Age 19–44y | −1.18 | <.0001 | −1.19 | <.0001 |
Age ≥45y | −1.23 | <.0001 | −1.24 | <.0001 |
Female | 0.22 | <.0001 | 0.22 | <.0001 |
Urbanicity | 0.02 | <.0001 | 0.02 | <.0001 |
Medium income*year 2004 | 0.04 | 0.74 | ||
High income*year 2004 | 0.49 | <.0001 | ||
Medium income*year 2006 | 0.20 | 0.04 | ||
High income*year 2006 | 0.61 | <.0001 | ||
Medium income*year 2009 | 0.18 | 0.05 | ||
High income*year 2009 | 0.42 | <.0001 | ||
Likelihood ratio test | p<0.001 |
A person is defined as a snacker if he or she consumes any snack during the three days investigated in this study.
Model1 adjusts for only potential confounders with no interaction terms.
Model2 includes both confounders and significant time-income interaction items (time-education and income-education interactions are not significant; p<0.05); the referent in the model 1 and model 2 was year 1991, low income, low education, male, age 2–6 years.