Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2012 Jan 9;160(6):936–942. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.11.054

Table 3.

Comparison of Treatment Groups by Pressure Passivity Index (PPI)

Measure Control
(N=12)
Conservative
(N=6)
Indomethacin
(N=12)
Ligation
(N=10)

Baseline rSO2 (%) 74 ± 3 68 ± 4 68 ± 3 63 ± 4

Baseline PPI (%) 5 ± 2 9 ± 2 13 ± 5 13 ± 6

2 h PPI (%) n/a 11 ± 3 8 ± 4 29 ± 2
Δ 2 h PPI (%)* 2 ± 3 −5 ± 4 16 ± 3

6 h PPI (%) n/a 15 ± 3 12 ± 3 20 ± 2
Δ 6 h PPI (%) 6 ± 3 −0.8 ± 3 7 ± 2

12 h PPI (%) n/a 14 ± 2 12 ± 4 17 ± 3
Δ 12 h PPI (%) 5 ± 2 0.9 ± 3 4 ± 2

24 h PPI (%) n/a 15 ± 2 11 ± 3 17 ± 2
Δ 24 h PPI (%) 6 ± 2 -2 ± 3 4 ± 1

Plus-minus values are means ± standard error of the mean.

PPI values are averages over the time interval.

*

Difference between conservative management and ligation groups (p=0.04), and difference between indomethacin and ligation groups (p=0.0007).