Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 May;51(5):506–517. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.02.020

Table 1.

Design of the study: n of subjects in each condition (Total N=318×2=636)

Order of interviews Male
n=313
Female
n=323
White
n=131
Non-white
n=182
White
n=132
Non-white
n=191
9–12
n=64
12–16
n=67
9–12
n=98
12–16
n=84
9–12
n=67
12–16
n=65
9–12
n=88
12–16
n=103
DISC/DAWBA n=105 9 10 18 15 10 11 17 15
DAWBA/DISC n=108 12 14 16 11 13 12 15 15
DISC/CAPA n=106 11 11 18 14 11 11 12 18
CAPA/DISC n=102 11 8 15 16 9 11 17 15
CAPA/DAWBA n=108 13 11 14 14 11 12 14 19
DAWBA/CAPA n=107 8 13 17 14 13 8 13 21

Note: CAPA=Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment; DAWBA =Development and Well-Being Assessment; DISC=Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children.