Table 2.
Check | Description | ANATOMY | LOD | BRIDGE |
---|---|---|---|---|
Check 1 | Correct input given? | No (other versions) | No (only URLs) | No (only URLs) |
Check 2a) | Missing classes | 0 | 143 (47) | 12 |
Check 2b) | URI-label pair changes | 121 | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Check 3 | Standard format? | Yes | No | Yes |
Check 4 | URIs? | Yes | No (local names) | Yes |
Check 5 | Explicit relation types? | Yes | Yes | No (untyped) |
Check 6 | Multiple targets | 39 | 10 | Unknown |
Check 7 | New ⊆ inferred from ≡ | 10,415 | 540 | Unknown |
Check 8 | Label identity but no ≡ | 13 | 37 | Unknown |
Check 9 | Label inclusion but no ⊆ | 3,127 | 57 | Unknown |
Check 10 | Trivial correspondences | 916 (60%) | 158 (7%) | Unknown |
Results of applying the ten basic quality checks to the ANATOMY, LOD and BRIDGE data sets. The symbols ≡ and ⊆ stand for equivalentClass and subClassOf-based correspondences, respectively.