Table 2.
Correlation of the predominant mucosal and vascular patterns with histological results during high resolution white light endoscopy or after 2% acetic acid pulverisation and Fujinon intelligent chromoendoscopy 0, 4 and 7
High resolution white light |
Acetic acid pulverisation and FICE |
|||||
Normal histology | SIM or LGD | HGD or carcinoma | Normal histology | SIM or LGD | HGD or carcinoma | |
Number of patients (%) | 5 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
Regular or not visualized mucosal pattern1 (%) | 100 | 100 | 86 | 100 | 100 | 0 |
Irregular mucosal pattern (%) | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
Regular or not visualized vascular pattern1 (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 14 |
Abnormal blood vessels (%) | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 86 |
Raised lesion (%) | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 71 |
Pigmented lesion (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37.5 | 0 |
Bleeding lesion (%) | 0 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 57 |
Ulcerous lesion (%) | 0 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
FICE: Fujinon intelligent chromoendoscopy; SIM: Specialized intestinal metaplasia; HGD: High-grade dysplasia; LGD: Indicate Low grade dysplasia.
Endoscopists were not able to exactly classify the mucosal pattern according to Sharma’s classification of mucosal pattern due to lack of visibility, but they judged that the mucosa was regular.